bktheirregular: (Default)
I only ever got into one fistfight growing up, at summer camp to a bully who'd invaded my dorm room with his entourage, and I lost. Badly. Decisively. Back then, I was a scrawny little guy.

In short: I was never a physical threat to anyone, growing up.

But I didn't look around at people and automatically categorize them as threats, either.

The more I read, the more I learn, the more I realize that I'm luckier than half the human race in that last regard; looking at the statistics of women who've suffered assaults - one in four, was it? - I come to the conclusion that a passerby on the street, or someone getting into an elevator with me, would have to be crazy not to categorize me as a potential threat. Especially since I'm no longer the scrawny near-midget I was growing up.

People I know will laugh with me, joke with me, feel safe around me - but that's because they're people who know me, know my attitudes, know how I act and how I carry myself. They know from experience that I don't act as an aggressor.

A stranger can't know that.

A woman in an elevator, with no knowledge, would see ... what? A man, taller, heavier, physically capable of doing harm. No way of knowing what's going on behind those eyes.

And that one-in-four chance of violence.

The whole issue is worse here, I think - not here at the office, where the women outnumber the men by something like five-to-one, but in the nation, which still has a misogynist streak a mile wide, colored by old-world values and a sort of entrenched patriarchal system.

How to change it? How does one person change a world?

First step is acknowledging the problem, right? Look in the mirror, and remind oneself:

I am a potential threat to anyone - and in particular any woman.

I figure Step Two is basically: Don't act as a threat. You'll be a threat anyway, just by standing there, but don't do anything active to threaten anyone.

Step Three is ... uh ...

...er...

...yeah, this is going to take some thinking.

Query

Jul. 21st, 2010 07:22 pm
bktheirregular: (Default)
Has anyone else heard an expression about a clock striking thirteen - something about it calling into question all the information that's ever come out of that clock, and any information that may come from the clock in the future?
bktheirregular: (1984)
Apparently one pundit said he'd be willing to undergo waterboarding, as a fundraiser for charity.

I wonder if he'd still be so blase about it with the following caveats:

1) No advance notice as to when the torture would begin.
2) No specifics as to how long the torture would last, or how often the torture would be repeated.
3) No freedom to do anything in between torture sessions.
4) No guarantee that he'd survive the torture.

I'm sorry, but waterboarding is torture, it's morally repugnant per se, and its practitioners and apologists should be ready to be metaphorically barbecued for an excruciatingly long period of time.

Whoever and wherever they are.

That is all.
bktheirregular: (Default)
"Families need to be utilitarian, not doctrinal. If it works, let it work."

-Ta-Nehishi Coates
bktheirregular: (Default)
Went to one of the offices on base before going out for my day-pass, to double-check for sure and certain when I get discharged. Was asked about the etymology of my name by the officer and an NCO who had come in during the discussion, and when I mentioned that the authorities mess up the translation constantly, I was asked: "what name were you given when you were baptized?"

They were shocked and dismayed to learn that I'd never been baptized, and even more dismayed to learn that I'm not part of any religion.

"I'm an agnostic. I don't have a church."
"So you're Catholic?"
"No; I don't have a church."
"Protestant?"

Which led to the NCO saying, with some urgency, that I needed to get my problem squared away, talk with a priest, and get myself baptized pronto once I get back to Athens. Talking as though I had a malignant cancer or a sucking chest wound.

I bit back my instinctive responses; I'm a miserable private, they're superior officers, what the hell could I say? Beyond "I'll bear that in mind."

Just as well I couldn't say "when hell freezes over" or "frell that".

I told them that I believe in being good to other people, in helping out those in need; apparently that's not enough. Apparently I have to join the structure of a religion, preferably the "right" religion.

I was ninety-three percent ready to say that I'd be lying to the priest if I said I wanted to be baptized. Just as well I bit my tongue.

They're trying the same thing in the US military, I hear. Proselytizing, as though there were only one proper religion.

Did I mention I was getting this from superior officers?

Forty-six hours to discharge. Can't come soon enough.
bktheirregular: (Default)
Dear American Family Association:

You ask "how do we define 'good' without 'God'?" My answer, for myself, is as follows:

In your good fortune, remember to help those less fortunate. Lend a helping hand whenever you have the chance, and let people know they can ask for help.

Don't hurt other people if you can possibly avoid it, and if you can't, do your damnedest to minimize the hurt.

Be gracious in victory; remember that defeat is painful (see above re: minimizing hurt).

Always remember that just about any action you take has an effect on others, and think about what that effect will be and what it will do to them. Again, see above.

I never had a minute's worth of religious indoctrination, and yet all that is practically instinct to me. My parents, skeptics both of them, made sure of it.

(And for what it's worth, the Greek root of "skeptic" is not "to disbelieve", but rather, simply, "to think".)

Sincerely (I learned that too),

Bruce
bktheirregular: (1984)
Thought of the day, with so much divisiveness in the air:

"...It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent national gifts. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support...."

-G. Washington, 1790

We've fallen short on many occasions. Sometimes badly. But it's a standard to live up to, no?

"To bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance."

People forget that. And they call people who remember it un-American.

Take it up with George.
bktheirregular: (1984)
Dredged up from the dust-bin of the news magazine Whiskey Tango Foxtrot:

"Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance?"

- Senator Roman Hruska, defending Judge G. Harold Carswell, nominated by Richard Nixon to the United States Supreme Court in 1970
bktheirregular: (1984)
"...a bad game, a sad and ugly game that's a lot easier to start than end. The worst versions I've seen end up with neither side in control, or getting anything they wanted. And the people who stand to lose the most in it frequently aren't even playing."

- Miles on hostage-taking (and maybe on brinksmanship in general), Komarr
bktheirregular: (Stewart)
Oops. )

Had a rant about someone complaining about the game "Spore". Turns out the source was probably a joke blog. Click the cut if you want to read it anyway, bearing in mind that I got taken for a sucker.
bktheirregular: (1984)
Gloat at the suffering of others, and you forfeit your human race privileges.
bktheirregular: (1984)
Someone who advocates the banning of books from libraries by the government is unfit to hold a position of authority over others.

Shouldn't be a controversial position, should it?
bktheirregular: (1984)
If I say "ignorance is strength only in IngSoc's Oceania", that statement can't be reasonably challenged, can it?

Oops.

Sep. 3rd, 2008 09:01 am
bktheirregular: (Heritage)
Turns out "Agnostos" didn't mean what I thought it meant. It actually means "the unknown one" or "one not known to others".

Ah well. That also fits me.
bktheirregular: (1984)
Inspired by a note on the Talking Points Memo:

If treated with respect, reality will leave you be. But if provoked, reality will kick your butt from here to kingdom come.
bktheirregular: (1984)
A philosophy that fails in the absence of an enemy does not deserve to endure.
bktheirregular: (Default)
It's simple.

Waterboarding is a form of torture. Strapping someone onto a board and forcing him or her to inhale water, for whatever reason, is morally reprehensible. I trust that's not in dispute.

And people who torture others, no matter what their state of mind or justification, are committing evil acts.

And I seem to recall reading somewhere that "the end justifies the means" and "I was just following orders" don't cut it as excuses for committing evil acts...
bktheirregular: (Default)
"There's a billion places like home. But only one of 'em's where you live."

- Esmerelda Weatherwax, Terry Pratchett's Witches Abroad
bktheirregular: (1984)
I have opposed the Second Iraq War since before the first bomb fell.

I am a patriot; I care deeply about my country.

I am agnostos.

I am a real American.

Anyone who sees a contradiction somewhere in the above four statements gets nothing from me but contempt.
bktheirregular: (Default)
Don't know if anyone noticed that I changed the name of my journal. It's subtle, I grant you, but still.

Maybe "agnostic" isn't the right word for what I am, but it comes closest. Like the subtitle says, it's derived from a Greek word, γνωση, literally "knowledge". The α prefix in Greek is a negative, so: one who does not know.

And the title of my friends' page comes from The Vor Game, in recognition that anyone who turns up there (and most likely, anyone reading this yammering) is following their own path to that uncertain future. I've got a friends-list count of fifty-six; I doubt that the number of paths being followed by the people on the list is less than half of that.

Reading over that, I'm not sure how it comes out...

Profile

bktheirregular: (Default)
bktheirregular

May 2021

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios